明末清初耶穌會思想文獻匯編 = An expository collection of the Christian philosophical works between the end of the Ming dynasty and the beginning of the Qing dynasty in China ; 第25冊.

Local access dig.pdf. in folder: [Andrew Chung Series].

"Buglio quotes and refutes 33 statements from the Pixie lun 闢邪論 of Yang Guangxian 楊光先 (contained in his Budeyi 不得已)."
Full bibliographic citations see: Ad Dudink & Nicolas Standaert, Chinese Christian Texts Database (CCT-Database)

JapSin I, 90
Budeyi bian 不得已辯.
By Li Leisi 李類思 (Lodovico Buglio).
One juan, Chinese bamboo paper in one volume. No date or place of publication.

The cover bears a Latin inscription: “Refutatio persecutoris Yam quam sien circa res fidei a p. Lud. Buglio, S.J.”

JapSin I, 90a
This is the same edition as Jap-Sin I, 90.
Source: Albert Chan, S.J., Chinese Books and Documents in the Jesuit Archives in Rome, p. 145.

JapSin I, 91
This is the same edition as Jap-Sin I, 90 and Jap-Sin I, 90a. One folio is missing from the preface. Romanizations are written on some of the folios.
Source: Albert Chan, S.J., Chinese Books and Documents in the Jesuit Archives in Rome, p. 145.

JapSin I, 92
Budeyi bian 不得已辨.
By Li Leisi 李類思 (Lodovico Buglio).
No date or place of publication.

This edition differs from the one just mentioned (Jap-Sin I, 90, 90a, and 91). Though it is now bound in one volume, there are signs of its having earlier been in two separated volumes.
The preface is missing. The title is given on the first folio; the character 辨 is used instead of 辯, found in the other edition. Again, in 極西耶穌會士 the character yuan 遠 is substituted for ji 極. In Buglio’s Chinese name the character lei 類 is written [米 + 女 + 頁], as quite commonly appears in the printing of the Ming and Qing books.
There are nine columns in each half folio with twenty characters in each column. The upper middle of the folios does not bear the title of the book and the fish tail does not appear until after folio 5. When it does appear the number of the folio is given under it. The book is incomplete and only fifty-three folios remain. The picture of Shang Tang’s praying for rain is not there.
Comparison with the above mentioned edition shows that there are a number of differences between the two texts (Jap-Sin I, 90 and 92); the following are some of them:

Doc.---Folio---Line--Difference
90---1a---5---歷引天學書
92---1a---5---zhai 摘 instead of yin
90---1a---2---恠誕, 果蠕
92---1a---2---怪誕, 菓蠕
90---1a---7---無恠其出言之舛
92---1a---7---無足為怪
90---1a---9---攷,徹
92---1a---9---考,撒
90---1b---1---拆
92---1b---1---折

Also, the two lines of annotations on folio 1b in Jap-Sin I, 90 do not appear in Jap-Sin I, 92. It seems that Jap-Sin I, 92 is an older edition and that Jap-Sin I, 90 is amended in an attempt to get rid of a number of particles and so make the text more simple for the ordinary readers.
Another difference between the two editions is that Jap-Sin I, 92 does not have the appendix Zhongguo churen bian 中國初人辨, but this omission might be explained by the fact that Jap-Sin I, 92 is an incomplete copy. On the other hand, folio 49 of Jap-Sin I, 92 gives the Tianzhujiao yuezheng 天主教約徵 (Some [clear] proofs of the Catholic doctrine), which is not found in the other edition.

Cf. Pfister, p. 241; Hsü 1949, pp. 235–236; Courant 4984–4991; HHSK 10:1274.
Source: Albert Chan, S.J., Chinese Books and Documents in the Jesuit Archives in Rome, pp. 145-146.

I. Nangong shudu (1620), Poxie ji (1640) and Western reports on the Nanking Persecution (1616/1617). -– II. The inventories of the Jesuit house at Nanking made up during the persecution of 1616/1617 (Shen Que, Nangong shudu, 1620) –- III. Shengchao zupoi (1623) by Xu Dashou: the date and background of the longest anti-Christian essay of late Ming times. –- IV. Zhang Geng, Christian convert of late Ming times: descendant of Nestorian Christians? -- V. The religious works composed by Adam Schall (1592-1666), especially his Zhuzhi qunzheng (1636), and his efforts (since 1640) to convert the last Ming emperor.

Local access dig.pdf. [Dudink-Five Studies.pdf]