Subject: Buglio, Lodovico 利類思, 1606-1682. Shizi shuo 獅子說

Kangxi chaogong shi yu Li Leisi de Shizi shuo 康熙朝貢獅與利類思的獅子說
AuthorZou Zhenhuan 鄒振環
Place---
Publisher---
CollectionRicci Institute Library
LanguageChinese 中文[簡體]
TypeDocument (pdf)
ShelfDigital Archives
Call NumberQL737.C23 Z7 2013
DescriptionDig.pdf. [11 p.]
NoteKangxi chaogong shi yu Li Leisi de “Shizi shuo” 康熙朝貢獅與利類思的《獅子說》 / Zou Zhenhuan 鄒振環.
Includes bibliographical references.
《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》, 2013年06期, pp. 1-11.
摘要: 中國古代不乏從政治和文學角度描摹獅子的作品,但直至清初仍沒有討論這一動物的專門文獻。伴隨康熙十七年的貢獅活動而出現的利類思的《獅子說》,是第一篇從動物知識的角度討論獅子的漢文文獻,也是一部歐洲“獅文化”的簡明百科全書。利類思試圖通過《獅子說》傳播西方的動物文化,特別是基督教動物知識;並從基督教傳播的角度切入,試圖打破佛教文獻中關於獅子與佛教的聯繫;又通過質疑歷史上陸路貢獅的可靠性,企圖在中國開創基督教系統敘述獅文化的新傳統。通過《獅子說》與亞里士多德《動物誌》中有關獅子內容的比對可知,利類思《獅子說》中提及的“亞利”,並非如方豪所說的為“亞特洛望地”,更有可能是指“亞里士多德”。
Local access dig.pdf. [康熙朝貢獅與利類思的《獅子說》.pdf]
Natural history floating across the oceans : Ludovico Buglio’s Shizi shuo (on Lions)
AuthorYu Yating 余雅婷
CollectionRicci Institute Library
LanguageEnglish
TypeArticle (in Periodical)
ShelfDigital Archives
Call NumberPL472 Y38 2026
Description24 p.
Note

Natural history floating across the oceans : Ludovico Buglio’s Shizi shuo (on Lions) / Yu Yating 余雅婷

Monumenta Serica, Volume 74, Issue 1 (2026), Pages: 71-95

 

Available through
Taylor & Francis

 

Abstract
In the process of contact between Chinese and Western natural history, Ludovico Buglio’s (Li Leisi, 1606–1682) Shizi shuo (On Lions, 1678) can be described as the earliest text of Western biological knowledge to be introduced to China. We can trace this book’s knowledge of natural history back to the De historia animalium, by the renowned Greek scholar Aristotle (384–322 BCE). Subsequently, Gaius Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Elder, AD 23/24–AD 79) authored Naturalis historia, an encyclopaedia on natural history that also includes references to Aristotle’s viewpoints. The medieval naturalist Albertus Magnus (Albert the Great, 1193–1280) later composed De animalibus, quoting Aristotle’s views and arguments. During the Renaissance, this link between Aristotle’s writings and Albertus Magnus’s text became a model to imitate for Conrad Gessner (1517–1565) and Ulisse Aldrovandi (1522–1605); finally, Buglio adopted it for his translations. By examining the sources adopted in Shizi shuo, this article explores the view of natural history hidden in the text and how, through the lens of Renaissance readings, such a view floated across the oceans and reached the early Qing dynasty.